Economy, Growth and Jobs
What is economic growth? It depends on many factors such as an expanding population that needs more goods and services eg. houses, agricultural goods (crops and meat), machinery, resources(metal ores, coal, minerals); the banking system that charges fees for lending money that it does not fully hold in deposits; corporations that reward their shareholders with dividends and higher share prices; and entrepeneurs who sell their intellectual capital at whatever price they can get. The goal is to have high exports, increasing the country's earnings, thereby boosting its economic growth and wealth.
How much money do we really need? It may be preferable to have just enough to support our family, and have more community and leisure time and create a better environment for ourselves. We may wish to get off the treadmill of 60 hour weeks, working for organisations with a shareholder profit focus at the expense of employees, the community and the environment.
By creating extra "wealth" or money, this increases economic growth, generating inflation and putting pressure on individuals to seek higher income. Also, countries need to find more jobs for expanding populations, and following conventional economics, try to stimulate economic growth.
Groups or individuals may wish to add a comment (Just register first) about how we can manage our economy and jobs better, with alternatives such as:
1. Promoting a Zero Population Growth (ZPG) ie. no more than 2 children per family, or optimum population, to combat the looming resource shortage, including Peak Oil.
2. Moving to a Steady State Economy (H. Daly, or Ted Trainer's - The Simpler Way) where there is zero economic growth, since resources are finite. As Ted Trainer mentions, we should combine Men's Sheds with Community food gardens. This would allow the retired men to help build the garden structures, and repair broken appliances and goods from waste pickups (eg. Hunter Resource Recovery, or Life Cycle Hunter), and sell these to second hand stores to gain income.
3. Replacing "invented" money as the unit of currency (it used to be based on gold, until governments gave bankers the power to create "money" as debt, and let the bankers direct this to any purpose they deemed worthwhile) with something that has real value eg. Energy - Joules (see David MacKay's Sustainable Energy - Without Hot Air). This would mean that waste and goods thrown out by our consumerist society would become highly valued, especially if they were made of materials with high embodied energy (Aluminium, steel, concrete/cement), took a lot of energy to extract eg. difficult or extensive mining activities (gold, copper, zinc) or with large transport energy (goods from overseas), or needed much energy to process (chemicals, medicines). It would also reduce the consumption of high-energy valuable resources that are rapidly used eg. fossil fuels (oil, coal, which would assist with lowering greenhouse gas pollution.
4. Having more cooperative (employee shareholders), triple-bottom-line (economic, ecological and social) and not-for-profit organisations, leading to more organisations with high corporate social responsibillity (CSR). For a good community examples, see Ted Trainer's Save Our Town with Community Development Cooperatives, using LETS bartering schemes.
5. Finding fair employment for all/most, by sharing more part-time jobs (currently about 1/3 of all jobs in Australia - ABS - jobs) providing enough wealth with more leisure time, and more time to build community and internal resources eg. better houses, food gardens, water security. This could be the case easily for the 1/3 of Australians who have paid off their mortgage (ABS - mortage), and we can afford to reduce our very high Human Development Index of 4th in the world (a measure of health, wealth and education - Wiki - HDI, 2008), and so reduce our resource consumption.
6. In times of downturns, we could build our own internal infrastructure (personally, community, state and federally). This would increase our own resilience, rather than give handouts that eventually end up with shareholders of corporations, which often includes managers who are paid hundreds of times the average employee's wage and may receive shares as well.
7. Use a local currency, such as the "Molly" from LETS (see Hunter LETS), which encourages the labour and energy expended in a region to remain within the region. This means that profits are not exported outside the local area to where the prices of labour, materials or energy have been distorted by practices that may be unfair, have a poor regulatory basis, that waste resources or take advantage of society or the environment.
Please supply some details of what you would like to see and how it would work.
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
Our website, like the Transition Movement, is evolving as we look for the pathways forward to sustainable and resilient communities. If you are offended by any content, or think that any postings are inappropriate please contact us (see Stay in Touch in above menu).
Comments
employment options
Mayfield Community Bank
There is a group of people exploring the possibility of establishing a Community Bank Branch in Mayfield. Details are at http://mayfieldcommunitybank.blogspot.com/.
Graeme
Transition Town Newcastle
Energy dollars - see Dr Shann Turnbull
Dr Shann Turnbull (author of "Democratising the Wealth of Nations" has published in Peter Droege's 2008 book "Urban Energy Transition - From Fossil Fuels to Renewable Power" a chapter called "Energy Development and Sustainable Monetary Systems".
In it he explains how economic activities can be "financed by a local currency
whose value is defined in terms of kilowatt-hours generated from sustainable sources to
create ‘ energy ’ dollars."
The chapter "explains how the generation of renewable energy, the creation of sustainable communities and making capitalism sustainable can be designed to become self-reinforcing."
Shann acknowledges schemes such as LETS (Local Energy Trading System) which barters labour hours.
He also mentions one of the problems with establishing a local currency "is how to get it issued, used and distributed. This problem is minimized by a commodity-backed currency when there is a universal demand for the commodity like electrical power. The power authority could require or provide a compelling incentive for its energy bills to be paid with energy dollars. In addition, the CLB (Community Land Bank), like any other local government authority could require or provide a compelling incentive for some or all of its rates, taxes and rents to be paid in energy dollars."
Toxic economies in history:
Toxic economies in history: THOMAS SULLIVAN MAY 29, 2009
Lately I've been reading Eduardo Galeano's book, Open Veins Of Latin America. The early portion of the book discusses what happened to Spain in the 16th century following its conquest of Latin America. The Spanish created mines and drained the area of its gold and silver, so receiving a huge infusion of unearned money.
One might suspect that this windfall turned Spain into an economic powerhouse. But some funny things happened when the easy money arrived. The Spanish king proceeded to spend a huge amount of the nation's reserves on wars against the 'enemies of Christianity'.
The nobility and upper-classes poured vast sums into new estates, palatial homes, and luxury goods imported from other countries. Many in the lower classes, attempting to emulate the gilded, ostentatious lifestyle of those above them, abandoned productive jobs and rushed into speculative pursuits.
Little of the new money was invested in domestic industries, and tariffs were dropped to meet consumer demand. In the end the new money flowed out of Spain, the local industries crumbled, and the nation ended up bankrupt.
Sound familiar? Replace the words 'gold' and 'silver' with 'credit' and 'leverage' and you have a pretty accurate description of the United States over the last decade. And, to a lesser extent, of other 'advanced' nations like England.
The parallel experiences of 16th century Spain and of the United States and England 500 years later suggest that it is perilous for a nation to put the interests of finance and speculation over real investment and production. In a global economy, the peril extends to the other nations it conducts business with, which is pretty well the whole world.
The parallel also suggests there's a big difference between creating wealth (as real industries do) and making money (as stock market players and bubble speculators do). You can make a ton of money and not create any wealth. Making $100,000 flipping a house or trading stocks creates the same amount of real wealth for a country — zero.
So what could nations do to get real investment in real industries flowing again?
An enticing idea, floating around for some time, has not received the attention it deserves. The idea is simple and straightforward: it would place a small transaction tax of one penny on every stock market trade and use the proceeds to invest in real industries that create real wealth.
In this way you tap speculation (money making) and use it to create real, long-term wealth.
At a very small cost to speculators nations could give themselves the means to launch real programs for building the industries of tomorrow that they desperately need. It could also re-fund essential public programs, like public health centers that must deal with the threat of swine flu during a time of budget cut-backs.
Getting that penny out of the speculators will be a fight. But if the American tea-partiers are any indication, working people won't be ponying up investment money anytime soon. And they shouldn't have to. They've been surrendering their pennies for long enough while they work at (and are fired by) companies that create real wealth.
________________________________________
Thomas Sullivan grew up in Connecticut (epicenter of the financial crisis) and now lives in Seattle. His writing has appeared in Arts & Opinion, Bravado Literary Magazine, and Dogmatika. He welcomes your comments at tmpsull@gmail.com
Local expertise
For local information and lectures on economics, employment and equity, please go to University of Newcastle's CofFEE link at http://e1.newcastle.edu.au/coffee/
Traditionally, economics is
[img_assist|nid=191|title=|desc=|link=none|align=left|width=100|height=144]Traditionally, economics is about how we use and share resources, and it is now more than obvious that the the way we have been doing this is destructive to our environment and socially inequitable. Some see the doctrine of progress as having been one of economic mal-development, but it is hard to hear beyond the refrain that this is the best system we have, and the notion that there are no alternatives.
The root of the words ecology and economy comes from the greek word meaning "home", and should be about managing our local and global home in a caring way. The body of work called Gaian Economics by Moly Cato and others takes the planet into account, and takes a very different and broader view of the economy than being just about making money and maintaining growth at whatever cost.
See http://gaianeconomics.org